<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s talk about what Nandy really said</title>
	<atom:link href="/economicsocialpolicy/lets-talk-about-what-nandy-really-said/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/economicsocialpolicy/lets-talk-about-what-nandy-really-said</link>
	<description>Powered by Webshore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/economicsocialpolicy/lets-talk-about-what-nandy-really-said#comment-12773</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=5315#comment-12773</guid>
		<description>Tejpal&#039;s generalisations, particularly the one about man-made laws, are unfortunate.

I appreciate their idea of &#039;corruption&#039; which encompasses both illegal acts and economically inefficient (perhaps even ethically improper) ones. Perhaps they would even go so far as to say that the difference in degree of &#039;corruption&#039; between India and Singapore reflects a difference in degree of institutionalisation of &#039;corruption&#039;. Let us not tilt at their windmills.

In the past, the shadow economy has proven a practical means of redistributing wealth in our oligarchy. However, one can hope that the rule of our (constitutional) law will favour certainty and transparency in providing a measurable means of sustenance to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tejpal&#8217;s generalisations, particularly the one about man-made laws, are unfortunate.</p>
<p>I appreciate their idea of &#8216;corruption&#8217; which encompasses both illegal acts and economically inefficient (perhaps even ethically improper) ones. Perhaps they would even go so far as to say that the difference in degree of &#8216;corruption&#8217; between India and Singapore reflects a difference in degree of institutionalisation of &#8216;corruption&#8217;. Let us not tilt at their windmills.</p>
<p>In the past, the shadow economy has proven a practical means of redistributing wealth in our oligarchy. However, one can hope that the rule of our (constitutional) law will favour certainty and transparency in providing a measurable means of sustenance to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/economicsocialpolicy/lets-talk-about-what-nandy-really-said#comment-12662</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 02:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=5315#comment-12662</guid>
		<description>A first rate piece! I hope Nandy reads it--I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll enjoy it since his heart is in the right place even if, on this occasion, his mouth wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A first rate piece! I hope Nandy reads it&#8211;I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll enjoy it since his heart is in the right place even if, on this occasion, his mouth wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
