Comments on: The Basic Structure Doctrine: An insider’s view http://www.criticaltwenties.in/lawthejudiciary/the-basic-structure-doctrine-an-insiders-view Powered by Webshore Wed, 02 Sep 2015 13:53:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: anonymous http://www.criticaltwenties.in/lawthejudiciary/the-basic-structure-doctrine-an-insiders-view#comment-9978 anonymous Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:15:11 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3870#comment-9978 It is Errabbi not Errabi It is Errabbi not Errabi

]]> By: Law Critical Digest: 6th December, 2011 | Critical Twenties http://www.criticaltwenties.in/lawthejudiciary/the-basic-structure-doctrine-an-insiders-view#comment-9948 Law Critical Digest: 6th December, 2011 | Critical Twenties Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:40:34 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3870#comment-9948 [...] 1. The Hindu carries a review of Andhyarujina’s fascinating book on the Basic Structure Doctrine. It praises the author’s efforts to bring to light the murky and somewhat morally ambiguous manner in which the Kesavananda case was decided but also points out the many silences about the merits of the case itself and its borrowing of Seervai’s critique in The Inside Story I made a somewhat similar argument as regards the book and its gaps, but focussing also on critiquing the argument against the Basic Structure in this piece. [...] [...] 1. The Hindu carries a review of Andhyarujina’s fascinating book on the Basic Structure Doctrine. It praises the author’s efforts to bring to light the murky and somewhat morally ambiguous manner in which the Kesavananda case was decided but also points out the many silences about the merits of the case itself and its borrowing of Seervai’s critique in The Inside Story I made a somewhat similar argument as regards the book and its gaps, but focussing also on critiquing the argument against the Basic Structure in this piece. [...]

]]> By: Alok http://www.criticaltwenties.in/lawthejudiciary/the-basic-structure-doctrine-an-insiders-view#comment-9792 Alok Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:29:29 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3870#comment-9792 @Aarthi Thanks :) @Anonymous All the sources, incl. Andhyrujina seem to refer to him as Dieter Conrad so I have followed that spelling. @Aarthi

Thanks :)

@Anonymous

All the sources, incl. Andhyrujina seem to refer to him as Dieter Conrad so I have followed that spelling.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.criticaltwenties.in/lawthejudiciary/the-basic-structure-doctrine-an-insiders-view#comment-9791 Anonymous Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:11:47 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3870#comment-9791 Wasn't the german chap "Dietrich Conrad"? Wasn’t the german chap “Dietrich Conrad”?

]]> By: Aarthi http://www.criticaltwenties.in/lawthejudiciary/the-basic-structure-doctrine-an-insiders-view#comment-9769 Aarthi Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:13:38 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3870#comment-9769 Excellent piece of commentary, P! I thought the book even if thin on analysis of the doctrine is altogether redeemed by its juicy bits on the De-Seervai squabble, and the entire chapter on the attempted-and-aborted review. My eyebrows remained stitched to the top of my forehead while reading the latter. Excellent piece of commentary, P! I thought the book even if thin on analysis of the doctrine is altogether redeemed by its juicy bits on the De-Seervai squabble, and the entire chapter on the attempted-and-aborted review. My eyebrows remained stitched to the top of my forehead while reading the latter.

]]>