<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defence of Tim Burton</title>
	<atom:link href="/mediapopularculture/in-defence-of-tim-burton/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/mediapopularculture/in-defence-of-tim-burton</link>
	<description>Powered by Webshore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:17:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zack zoey acrylic collegiate</title>
		<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/mediapopularculture/in-defence-of-tim-burton#comment-17447</link>
		<dc:creator>zack zoey acrylic collegiate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=4920#comment-17447</guid>
		<description>Unquestionably believe that that you said. Your favourite reason seemed to be at the web the easiest thing to bear in mind of.

I say to you, I definitely get annoyed whilst other 
folks consider concerns that they just do not understand about.
You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest 
and also outlined out the entire thing with no need side effect , other folks could 
take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unquestionably believe that that you said. Your favourite reason seemed to be at the web the easiest thing to bear in mind of.</p>
<p>I say to you, I definitely get annoyed whilst other<br />
folks consider concerns that they just do not understand about.<br />
You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest<br />
and also outlined out the entire thing with no need side effect , other folks could<br />
take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Ten Films of 2012 (And Then Some) &#124; Critical Twenties</title>
		<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/mediapopularculture/in-defence-of-tim-burton#comment-12074</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Ten Films of 2012 (And Then Some) &#124; Critical Twenties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=4920#comment-12074</guid>
		<description>[...] Dark Shadows: Burton sure knows how to weave the macabre with the funny but it lacked that Burton quality that makes us shiver and weep and laugh at the same time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dark Shadows: Burton sure knows how to weave the macabre with the funny but it lacked that Burton quality that makes us shiver and weep and laugh at the same time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lekha</title>
		<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/mediapopularculture/in-defence-of-tim-burton#comment-11058</link>
		<dc:creator>Lekha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 08:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=4920#comment-11058</guid>
		<description>Actually, Tarantino is also very guilty of his trademarks.  His foot fetish is a common thread across his movies and I guess repeated use of Tim Roth and Uma Thurman. I suppose, Spielberg is the most versatile of the biggest directors, but he hasn&#039;t directed anything noteworthy in ages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Tarantino is also very guilty of his trademarks.  His foot fetish is a common thread across his movies and I guess repeated use of Tim Roth and Uma Thurman. I suppose, Spielberg is the most versatile of the biggest directors, but he hasn&#8217;t directed anything noteworthy in ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pranav</title>
		<link>http://www.criticaltwenties.in/mediapopularculture/in-defence-of-tim-burton#comment-11049</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=4920#comment-11049</guid>
		<description>As a Tim Burton fan I concur with pretty much everything you&#039;ve written. I had similar thoughts after reading a bad review of Wes Anderson&#039;s Moonrise Kingdom. Good directors seem to use the same actors for a reason...in fact I can&#039;t think of too many of the so called &#039;greats&#039; who don&#039;t use the same actors. Tarantino perhaps...off the top of my head...but even he has cast Michael Madsen in almost every one of his films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Tim Burton fan I concur with pretty much everything you&#8217;ve written. I had similar thoughts after reading a bad review of Wes Anderson&#8217;s Moonrise Kingdom. Good directors seem to use the same actors for a reason&#8230;in fact I can&#8217;t think of too many of the so called &#8216;greats&#8217; who don&#8217;t use the same actors. Tarantino perhaps&#8230;off the top of my head&#8230;but even he has cast Michael Madsen in almost every one of his films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
