http://www.criticaltwenties.in/nationalpolitics/a-second-hand-show Powered by Webshore Mon, 16 Mar 2015 07:51:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/nationalpolitics/a-second-hand-show#comment-20593 m88wi Sat, 14 Mar 2015 09:20:51 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3408#comment-20593 If some one wants expert view concerning blogging and site-building then i propose him/her to visit this website, Keep up the pleasant job. If some one wants expert view concerning blogging and site-building then i propose
him/her to visit this website, Keep up the pleasant job.

]]> http://www.criticaltwenties.in/nationalpolitics/a-second-hand-show#comment-9025 Dhirendra Sat, 02 Jul 2011 07:54:55 +0000 http://www.criticaltwenties.in/?p=3408#comment-9025 Anna Hazare, Kiran Bedi etc do not represent people of India but it seems that the 5 editors picked by PMO surely represent people of India. It is a great relief to find that the country has ultimately found a way to detect as to who represents public. This event can serve as a great lesson for psychologists, strategists, negotiation session plannerrs. Had he invited large number of journalists no body would feel obliged but inviting just 5 and that too as first five makes one feel none less than Neils Armstrong. The strategy surely paid off. The 5 were defending PM more whelemently than the PM would have defended himself. No one questioned the criteria of selection nor as to what was wrong with TV cameras? I want to knows ond fact- Were the journalists asked to remove their shoes? Anna Hazare, Kiran Bedi etc do not represent people of India but it seems that the 5 editors picked by PMO surely represent people of India. It is a great relief to find that the country has ultimately found a way to detect as to who represents public. This event can serve as a great lesson for psychologists, strategists, negotiation session plannerrs. Had he invited large number of journalists no body would feel obliged but inviting just 5 and that too as first five makes one feel none less than Neils Armstrong. The strategy surely paid off. The 5 were defending PM more whelemently than the PM would have defended himself. No one questioned the criteria of selection nor as to what was wrong with TV cameras? I want to knows ond fact- Were the journalists asked to remove their shoes?

]]>