Fiduciary Duties: To whom are they owed?

Written by  //  September 10, 2010  //  Corporate Law and Business  //  38 Comments

Mr. V. Umakanth had noted here the recent trend of imposing civil liability on auditors which are owed directly to shareholders. He had pointed out that this constitutes a departure from the traditional wisdom that the duty of reasonable care in such situations were owed to the company and not its shareholders. Along similar lines, V. Niranjan had discussed the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Reliance Natural Resources Ltd v. Reliance Industries Ltd. in the Indian Corporate Law blog. In particular, he had drawn the readers’ attention to observations in Justice Sudershan Reddy’s opinion that, “the board has to act in a fiduciary capacity vis-a-vis the shareholders”. While this controversial assertion (it runs contrary to the general understanding that fiduciary duties of directors are owed to the company and the company alone) is perhaps nothing more than a mere passing remark in the Reliance case, it seems to derive support from various other sources as well.

Prof. Gower, for instance remarks [Gower, Principles of Modern Company Law, 6th edn., p. 599-600]:

This however, does not mean that directors can never stand in a fiduciary relationship to the members; they well may if they are authorised by the latter to negotiate on their behalf with, for example, a potential takeover bidder. And something far less than the establishment of an agency relationship may suffice, particularly, as an important New Zealand decision illustrates, in the case of a family company, “depending upon all the surrounding circumstances and the nature of the responsibility which in a real and practical sense the director had assumed towards the shareholder”.

Courts have however not been able to precisely enumerate the circumstances when such a relationship may exist between the directors and shareholders. The decision of the Supreme Court in Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad v. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad [AIR 2005 SC 809] offers some guidance. The court in that case held:

A Director of a Company indisputably stands in a fiduciary capacity vis-à-vis the Company. He must act for the paramount interest of the company. He does not have any statutory duty to perform so far as individual shareholders are concerned subject of course to any special arrangement which may be entered into or a special circumstance that may arise in a particular case. Each case, thus, is required to be considered having regard to the fact situation obtaining therein and having regard to the existence of any special arrangement or special circumstance. [Paragraph 44]

Though the court conceded that “it is impossible to lay down a law which will have universal application”, it went on to enumerate at least two instances where the directors owe a direct duty to the shareholders. The first is when the directors take it upon themselves to advice shareholders and the shareholders act on such advice. This arises especially in cases where the shareholders are faced with the choice of accepting or rejecting a take-over bid. [Paragraph 79] The second is in a case of “transaction of sale and purchase of shares between the director and the shareholder”. [Paragraph 75] However, this was clearly not meant to be an exhaustive enumeration. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruling in Dale and Carrington v. P.K. Prathapan [(2005) 1 SCC 212] seems to add a third category of cases to this list. The court in that case opined:

It follows that in the matter of issue of additional shares, the directors owe a fiduciary duty to issue shares for a proper purpose. This duty is owed by them to the shareholders of the company.

The duty of directors to exercise powers conferred on them only for the purpose for which such powers were conferred is a well-established principle. However, the decision in Dale and Carrington arguably supports the view that every breach of the ‘proper purpose’ doctrine is a violation of the directors’ duty to the company’s shareholders which gives rise to an independent cause of action to the shareholder.

Prof. Wedderburn in his article in the Modern Law Review in 1965 had argued that the shareholders “over and above their specific rights under the articles (to dividend, share certificates etc.)” have “a personal right to have the company administered according to the terms of the articles”. [K. W. Wedderburn, “Contractual Rights under Articles of Association: An Overlooked Principle Illustrated”, 28(3) Modern Law Review (1965)] Is the decision in Dale and Carrington not implicit judicial recognition, albeit in a limited sense (i.e. restricted to cases improper purpose) of Prof. Wedderburn’s much criticised view?

About the Author

Krishnaprasad K.V. is a fourth year student of the B.A., LL.B (Hons.) programme at the National Law School of India University, Bangalore.

View all posts by

38 Comments on "Fiduciary Duties: To whom are they owed?"

  1. Niranjan September 10, 2010 at 2:32 pm ·

    Wonderful post, KP. Couple of points. First, I think we can draw an interesting parallel with the controversy over the contractual effect of section 20 contracts. However, do you believe that Professor Wedderburn’s view is consistent with other well-settled principles of common law, such as for example the principles on alteration of articles? The “bona fide in the interests of the company” test was rejected by the Court in Gambotto mainly because it fails offer adequate guidance to courts, but it does make the point that the company as an entity cannot be conflated with the shareholders. Further, given that there is generally no relationship of trust between the shareholders and the Board, do you think Dale and Carrington is correct?

  2. Krishnaprasad September 11, 2010 at 5:09 am ·

    Thank you, Niranjan.

    On the first point, I don’t think Prof. Wedderburn’s argument is that the company and its shareholders are to be conflated, though in effect that might be the outcome of his view. His article seems to suggest that the right to have the company administered according to its articles is a personal right of the shareholder. While I concede that the article offers little guidance as to any common law principle to which this personal right could be traced back to, I think it could be argued that it arises from an implied contract. Consider this passage from Pennington:

    “Probably a company may compel its directors to make good such loss even though they have no service contracts, on the ground that they are under a duty to the company to take proper care to prevent the company from suffering loss. Alternatively, the company could rely on the implied contract with its directors which arises from them serving as such, and undoubtedly a term prohibiting the misuse of their powers would be implied in that contract as in an express service contract.” [Pennington, 6th edn., p. 725]
    Note that this implied contract arises purely from conduct and expectancy. Why can’t such an implied contract be inferred between the shareholders and directors?

    On the second point, though Dale and Carrington technically seems to suggest that the duty to not breach “proper purpose” is owed to the shareholders, this rule has been applied only in the context of issue of shares. Similar is the position in England as well. [See, In Re Jermyn Street Turkish Baths [1970] 1 W.L.R. 1194; Howard Smith v. Ampol Petroleum, [1974] A.C. 821] Hence, while the wide interpretation of Dale and Carrington (that breach of “proper purpose” violates the shareholders’ rights) could perhaps be defended only on the basis of Prof. Wedderburn’s argument, the narrow view (that directors owe a duty to shareholders to issue shares only for a proper purpose) could find support on other independent grounds. Proprietary rights of shareholders over their shares, possibility of dilution of their stake in the company and the indirect impact that issue of shares could have on shareholders personal rights (the right to dividend, for instance) are a few possibilities that I can think of.

  3. Sharad Bansal September 11, 2010 at 5:24 am ·

    Stunning post, KP.

    One observation: Even though Dale and Carrington seeks to adopt Prof. Wedderburn’s view by expanding the scope of fiduciary duty owed by directors towards the shareholders, Sangramsinh itself limits the scope of this duty (paras 62 and 69).

  4. Shantanu September 11, 2010 at 7:44 am ·

    Great post KP.

    If I understand you correctly, the three instances you speak of in which directors may owe a fiduciary duty to shareholders, albeit non-exhaustive, are:
    1. when the directors take it upon themselves to advice shareholders and the shareholders act on such advice.
    2. a case of transaction of sale and purchase of shares between the director and the shareholder.
    3. a breach of the proper purpose doctrine (possibly only in relation to the issue of shares)

    In the first two cases, as you yourself point out, the duty owes its origins to principles of contract law; and not company law. If that is true, is it not incorrect to say that ‘directors owe a fiduciary duty to shareholders’, since the duty does not bind the directors due to his position as a director alone, but due to an additional position he has assumed (possibly aided by his position as a director).

    If this distinction were to be accepted, then the statement of the Court in Dale and Carrington seems suspicious. Because it is one thing to say that the breach of a doctrine will harm shareholders, and another to say that it is owed to shareholders. Because if it is owed to shareholders, the scope of the proper purpose will have to determined keeping in mind the interests of the shareholders over that of the corporation. This could put the directors in the unfortunate situation of their fiduciary duties conflicting. I haven’t read Dale and Carrington, but do you think that the Court, by talking of owing the duty to shareholders meant more that it was a duty, which if breached, will harm shareholders?

  5. Krisnaprasad September 19, 2010 at 9:20 am ·

    Thank you, Sharad and Shantanu for the comments and apologies for the delay in responding.

    Sharad’s obvervation is certainly true. For the benefit of other readers, let me set out the relevant paragraphs in Samgramsinh as pointed out by him. Paragraph 69 reads:

    69. The ratio in Dale and Carrington (supra), thus, must be understood to have been rendered in the fact situation obtaining in that case. It does not lay down a law that fiduciary duty of a director to the company extends to a shareholder so as to entitle him to be informed of all the important decisions taken by the Board of Directors. Such a broad proposition of law, if understood to have been laid down in Dale and Carrington, would be inconsistent with the duty of a director vis-à-vis the Company and the settled law that the statutory duty of a direction is primarily to look after the interest of the company.

    This seems to suggest, as I pointed out before that the duty of the directors to shareholders does not arise in all situations and the general rule remains that such duties are owed to the company. Paragraph 62 is perhaps more illuminating. It reads:

    62. Evidently, therefore, the ratio which emerges from the decision is that the duty to disclose as regard issue of additional shares is relatable to proper purpose thereof. If the purpose is proper and the action of the director is bona fide, the ratio should not be extended so as to hold that such a duty of the director towards the shareholder is absolute despite the fact that there is no legal requirement therefore. Duty of disclosure to shareholders in that case had a strong nexus with the affairs of the company. Dale & Carrington (supra) is not an authority for the proposition that the purported fiduciary duty of a director towards the shareholder is absolute although the transaction in question may not have a direct co-relationship with the affairs of the company.

    This, in my reading suggests two things. First, that proof of good faith on the part of the director is a good enough defence as regards direct claims of shareholders. Second and more importantly, that a direct relationship between shareholders and directors can be recognised only when the duty sought to be imposed on the director has a “direct co-relationship with the affairs of the company”. Needles to say, what constitutes a “director co-relationship” remains ambiguous. However, on a combined reading of Dale and Carrington and Sangramsinh, a measure directed at retaining control of the company certainly seems to satisfy this criterion.

  6. Krishnaprasad September 19, 2010 at 9:31 am ·

    On Shantanu’s point, I agree with you. However, while there is a distinction between the proposition that actions of directors could harm directors and that they owe a duty to shareholders, the court seems to uphold both these propositions. Your concern regarding the possibility of a conflict between the interests of the company and that of shareholders is valid, however, this paragraph from Sangramsingh seems to offer an answer:

    53. A distinction, thus, has been carved out as regards the fiduciary duty of the directors with regard to the property and funds of the company as contra-distinguished from the duty of directors to current shareholders as sellers of their shares. In case of conflict between two interests, the company’s interest must be protected. The directors, however, will have a fiduciary relation if they have taken unto themselves the burden of giving advice to current shareholders.

  7. Parimala June 27, 2011 at 3:36 am ·

    What about expanding scope of fiduciary duty owed by directors towards Third party with whom the company has entered into a contract. Are there any case laws for that ?

  8. Information December 29, 2011 at 7:19 pm ·

    Pretty great post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to mention that I’ve really loved browsing your weblog posts. After all I will be subscribing in your rss feed and I’m hoping you write once more very soon!

  9. free acupuncture March 27, 2014 at 9:41 am ·

    The 5 essentials or after a treatment. A person with a constitutional imbalance in earth tmj acupuncture
    may well sound as if they are really feeling the
    release of endorphins and other ‘feel- good’ molecules.
    Facial Gua Sha is performed by applying gentle scraping with some unique shaped jade boards and natural
    oil and cream on specific points related to the symptoms a patient may have.

    When people ask me what they should and should not be treated as a whole.
    A quick hint: Surprisingly, it is alleged that the origin of depression is stress.

  10. Wilbur March 28, 2014 at 12:54 am ·

    If you’re a runner, try walking on the day you have acupuncture benefits.
    The task of an acupuncturist is very simple.
    The acupuncture and tinnitus energy that is running through a field in a drug commercial, but rather views physical symptoms
    along with emotional symptoms and patients’ lifestyle choices.
    Acupuncture For Weight Loss WorksSince this is a treatment method that involves sticking fine needles into certain parts of the body in terms of weight loss.
    This will also be evaluated and they will advise you for
    changes where necessary.

  11. acupuncture in Bristol April 3, 2014 at 3:37 am ·

    Symptoms observed in rare diseases often reveal malfunctions occurring in the immune compromised are not
    normally associated with allergies to penicillin. People who have an allergy to watermelon,
    the AAAAI advises that you gargle with salt water can help because
    it takes away from the accommodation nose irritants that food intolerance testing cause

  12. tinnitus acupuncture April 4, 2014 at 5:30 am ·

    The key factor is that once a person is depressed, Chinese medicine, we say that it moves chin blood.

    The experts said bigger trials acupuncture and anxiety are now
    warranted. 6 percent experienced at least one day between sessions and up to $500 per policy year.
    However, there are those who are considering about going for acupuncture sessions for acne treatment.
    Naturally, I am excited! Santasiero does treat hemophiliac patients.
    The line of treatment is attractive to many people.

  13. business mortgage calculators online April 5, 2014 at 2:28 am ·

    That is really interesting, You’re an excessively skilled blogger.

    I have joined your rss feed and look forward to in search of
    extra of your fantastic post. Also, I’ve shared your website in my social networks

    Feel free to visit my website; business mortgage calculators online

  14. relationship tips April 7, 2014 at 1:37 pm ·

    I’m extremely inspired with your writing abilities as neatly as with the
    format to your weblog. Is that this a paid topic
    or did you modify it your self? Anyway keep up the excellent high quality
    writing, it’s uncommon to see a great weblog like this one today..

  15. April 13, 2014 at 2:41 am ·

    You could definitely see your enthusiasm within the article you write.
    The world hopes for even more passionate writers like
    you who are not afraid to say how they believe.
    Always follow your heart.

    Here is my web page – hay day astuce (

  16. mascara x mac April 13, 2014 at 4:46 am ·

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my
    own blog and was curious what all is required to get set up?
    I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% sure.
    Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated.

  17. Eric April 19, 2014 at 6:23 am ·

    So if someone wants to learn or even take your system, your workouts won’t be nearly
    as effective as shiatsu they ought to be fine. You can use
    different essential oils to create different aromatherapy experiences.
    This new concept has enabled Sunshine Herbs move out of the house.

  18. click April 20, 2014 at 12:37 am ·

    This is my first time visit at here and i am truly impressed to read all at single place.

  19. Facebook Hack April 23, 2014 at 2:51 am ·

    Hi there, yup this piece of writing is really pleasant and I have learned
    lot of things from itt concerning blogging. thanks.

  20. food intolerance test April 23, 2014 at 9:11 am ·

    Without spending keith ferris acupuncture a fortune on it.
    Ghee contains preformed vitamin A, vitamin B complex, zinc, iodine,
    selenium, etc. Women’s Health IssuesWomen’s health
    issues are serious business. The curative keith ferris
    acupuncture properties of these organic health products hold some amazing features.

    This makes it especially attractive to those individuals
    who do not poses good health, they also provide support in a variety of materials, such as almond butter balls.
    Such clinics offers a range of nutrients in a person s diet like fiber, calcium, and vitamin B.

  21. what is the venus factor April 24, 2014 at 5:40 am ·

    (She pauses a moment to look at some paintings on Gardenia’s walls.

    The boys are putting forth their talents that they’re finally realizing they have to do what they can for Zoomwood, among other things; I hope things work out
    for them, now. , and still not be guilty of overwork could just prove be the impossible feat.

    Feel free to visit my web page :: what is the venus factor

  22. Ashley April 26, 2014 at 10:15 pm ·

    They concern above the budding problems that can occur during
    medication. Isn’t it time to take some medicines that relate to your teeth, bones, and
    muscles. But being first certainly does not mean being the greatest and this
    is the great area of show you can come to Anti-aging show of course and meet Dr.

  23. Allergy April 26, 2014 at 10:17 pm ·

    Many people are not aware of the fact that it’s safe to pour old cleaning products down the drain, don’t pour
    more than acupuncture one at a time.

  24. Porn April 27, 2014 at 12:23 am ·

    An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto
    a coworker who was doing a little research on this. And
    he actually ordered me lunch simply because I stumbled upon
    it for him… lol. So let me reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanks for spending the time to discuss this topic here on your
    web site.

  25. Andrew April 27, 2014 at 3:52 am ·

    Greate article. Keep writing such kind of info on your blog. Im really impressed by your blog.
    Hello there, You have performed a fantastic job. I will definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I’m confident they will be benefited from this site.

  26. Titanfall Hack April 29, 2014 at 5:02 am ·

    This website was… how do you say it? Relevant!!

    Finally I’ve found something that helped me. Thank you!

  27. Abbey May 1, 2014 at 10:51 pm ·

    Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!

  28. hosting May 2, 2014 at 12:36 pm ·

    With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation?
    My site has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either written myself or outsourced but it looks like a lot of it is popping it up all over the
    web without my permission. Do you know any techniques to help protect against content from being ripped off?
    I’d definitely appreciate it.

  29. Sebastian May 5, 2014 at 2:54 pm ·

    I need to to thank you for this wonderful read!! I absolutely loved every little bit of it. I have got you book-marked to look at new things you post…

  30. watch movies May 9, 2014 at 3:08 pm ·

    Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News.

    Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News?

    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem
    to get there! Many thanks

  31. marchande d'amour gorge profonde brutale May 16, 2014 at 9:27 pm ·

    Superbe article pour ne rien changer

  32. Is Hemorrhoid Miracle a Scam May 17, 2014 at 10:30 pm ·

    Ahaa, its nice dialogue on the topic of this
    piece of writing here at this web site, I have read all that, so now me also commenting here.

  33. Alonzo June 4, 2014 at 7:06 pm ·

    He was supposed to grab something and meet me in the aisle, and I couldn’t
    find him, was trying to figure out where he went.

    Babe’s has three locations to choose from: North Main, East 32nd, and West 7th St.
    [Related: Kelly Osbourne has maintained 50-lb weight loss for over 2 years].

  34. sewer walnut June 18, 2014 at 7:14 pm ·

    When you are thinking of home design and fittings there’s a popular saying “home is where the heart is”.
    In addition, the environmental impact of pouring such chemicals down the
    drain and into the water supply can have serious ramifications for the future of our planet.

    Trained and licensed technicians can handle the
    worst type of situation and can control panels and can easily identify
    a vast variety of sewer problems.

  35. Raina June 23, 2014 at 4:43 pm ·

    It’s in reality a great and helpful piece of info. I’m glad that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.

  36. Titanfall gratuit July 2, 2014 at 12:10 am ·

    This is a topic which is close to my heart… Cheers! Exactly where are your contact
    details though?

  37. Nicky Gritten May 27, 2015 at 5:51 am ·

    I would also point out that California in Turlock is even more affordable but the summers are hot. That may ont be a big deal for some but for me that’s a huge deal.

Trackbacks for this post

  1. James Henry Ting: The Privy Council on Duress | Critical Twenties

Comments are now closed for this article.